Common Sense is a online documentary that looks at the historic concept of the Commons and how it is more relevant than ever - from solving problems and sharing resources - in present day communities.

Here at Opendesk, we’re really glad that Raymond and his team visited us about a month ago in our London studio. You can now watch the Digital & Cultural Commons chapter featuring Greenpeace and Machines Room.

A social system for the long- term stewardship of resources that preserves shared values and community identity. A self-organised system by which communities manage resources (both depletable and and replenishable) with minimal or no reliance on the Market or State. The wealth that we inherit or create together and must pass on, undiminished or enhanced, to our children. Our collective wealth includes the gifts of nature, civic infrastructure, cultural works and traditions, and knowledge. A sector of the economy (and life!) that generates value in ways that are often taken for granted – and often jeopardised by the Market-State.

There is no master inventory of commons because a commons arises whenever a given community decides it wishes to manage a resource in a collective manner, with special regard for equitable access, use and sustainability.

The commons is not a resource. It is a resource plus a defined community and the protocols, values and norms devised by the community to manage its resources. Many resources urgently need to be managed as commons, such as the atmosphere, oceans, genetic knowledge and biodiversity.

There is no commons without commoning – the social practices and norms for managing a resource for collective benefit. Forms of commoning naturally vary from one commons to another because humanity itself is so varied. And so there is no “standard template” for commons; merely “fractal affinities” or shared patterns and principles among commons. The commons must be understood, then, as a verb as much as a noun. A commons must be animated by bottom-up participation, personal responsibility,
transparency and self-policing accountability.

One of the great unacknowledged problems of our time is the enclosure of the commons - the expropriation and commercialisation of shared resources, usually for private market gain. Enclosure can be seen in many forms, including the patenting of genes and lifeforms, the use of copyrights to lock up creativity and culture, the privatisation of water and land, and attempts to transform the open Internet into a closed, proprietary marketplace, amongst many others. Enclosure is about dispossession.

It privatises and commodifies resources that belong to a community or to everyone, and dismantles a commons-based culture (egalitarian co-production and co-governance) with a market order (money-based producer/consumer relationships and hierarchies). Markets tend to have thin commitments to localities, cultures and ways of life; for any commons, however, these are indispensable.

The classic commons are small-scale and focused on natural resources; an estimated two billion people depend upon common assets like forests, fisheries, water, wildlife and other natural resources for their everyday Common Sense subsistence. But the contemporary struggle of commoners is to find new structures of law, institutional form and social practice that can enable diverse sorts of commons to work at larger scales and to protect their resources from market enclosure.

Open networks are a natural hosting infrastructure for Commons. They provide accessible, low-cost spaces
for people to devise their own forms of governance, rules, social practices and cultural expression. That’s why the Internet has spawned so many robust, productive commons: free and open source software, Wikipedia and countless wikis, more than 10,000 open access scholarly journals, the open educational resources (OER) movement, the open data movement, sites for collaborative art and culture, access to Fab Labs that blend global design with local production, and much more. In an age of capital-driven network platforms such as Facebook, Google and Uber, however, digital commons must take affirmative steps to protect the wealth they generate.

New commons forms and practices are needed at all levels – local, regional, national and global – and there is a need for new types of federation among commoners and linkages between different tiers of commons.
Trans-national commons are especially needed to help align governance with ecological realities and serve as a force for reconciliation across political boundaries. Thus to actualise the commons and deter market enclosures, we need innovations in law, public policy, commons-based governance, social practice and culture. All of these will manifest a very different worldview than now prevails in established governance systems, particularly those of the State and Market.

The original text by David Bollier can be found here.